News

  • Funding now available to defend applications under the Hague Abduction Convention

    Since May 2024 funding has been available to meet the reasonable legal costs of a defendant to an application seeking the return of a child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

  • The effect of the December 2022  changes to the Child Abduction Regulation

    The plain terms of reg 16(3)b of the regulations remain unchanged.” Justice Christie Department of Communities and Justice & Mercado [2023] FedCFamC1F874 at [118]. No substantive change to the law following the 8 December 2022 amendments to the Regulation governing applications under the Hague Abduction Convention.

  • Email from client

    Email from client

    Hello Rosa, 

    Hope this email finds you well. 

    Not sure if you remember talking to me at the end of last year, I lost my Hague Case in NZ and my son was ordered to return back to Australia. You were able to advise that we could return to any state in Australia after reviewing our documents. 

    We did go and make it to the Gold Coast, I obtained a great lawyer, Kathleen Simpson from DV Lawyers, where phenomenally she was able to help me when my relocation case for my son to go back to New Zealand [redacted]. If it wasn’t for you saying we could go anywhere I probably would not have made it there. So thank you! 

    We have been back home in NZ for the last 2 weeks and it honestly still does not feel real to be back here with my son after all that. I mentally prepared to be stuck there for 2-3 years. 

    After going through this here in NZ I have come to find that there is no real support in NZ for NZ mothers that get faced with The Hague Convention, and with talking to [redacted] (whom is the one that reached out to you on my behalf) we have decided to start a Charity here in NZ for mothers that will go through this here, and to raise as much awareness about this Law and hopefully funding to help any mothers that are faced having to return their children/babies back to the country they fled from. 

    So again… Thank you! You were a huge help for me and my son and we are now free.

  • Will the COVID-19 pandemic undermine the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention? – Australian Family Lawyer

    One of the earliest Australian cases raising the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Hague Abduction Convention1 cases was the appeal case of Walpole & Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice2 (Walpole).

    This appeal was heard in open court on 5 March 2020. At that time in Australia we were just starting to think that COVID-19 might affect us too. By the time the judgment was delivered electronically on 25 March 2020, Australia was in full lockdown and taking the whole situation very seriously indeed. A review of the Australian and international case law in 2020 demonstrates a relatively uniform approach to the novel virus and the legal arguments that have emerged as a consequence of it.

  • Presentation: Feminist Legal Perspectives seminar in July

    In the recent decision of Walpole [2020] FamCAFC 65, the Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia allowed an appeal against orders requiring two children aged three and two to return to New Zealand.

    “The result in this case demonstrates the effective operation of Regulation 16(3)(b) of the Abduction Regulations, in circumstances where the grave risk to the children arises from the likelihood of future family violence perpetrated by their father against their mother, including potential lethality”

    Suzanne Christie, Barrister at Culwulla Chambers and Rosa Saladino of the Hague Convention Legal Practice will present at the Feminist Legal Perspectives seminar Wed 29th Jul 2020, 5:45 pm – 7:00 pm AEST, facilitated by Klara Major, Legal Editor at The Law Society of NSW.

    Register here: https://lnkd.in/g54gfwm

  • Non Hague abduction to Australia

                _______________________

    CASE SUMARY

    Name of case: Nejem & Nejem [2019] FamCA 113
    Origin State: Non Specified African State
    Destination State: Australia
    Citation: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgibin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FamCA//2019/113.html                                    
    Court: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia of Australia        
    Status of case: Final
    Level of court: First Instance
    Published: Yes     
    Judge: Cronin, J        
    Order: That an expedited best interest of the children hearing be scheduled.                                                                               

    Facts:  

    The wife left the unspecified Non Hague Convention African State (NHCAS) on 4 August 2018 with the 2 children of the marriage aged 9 and 6years. Upon leaving the NHCAS the wife advised the husband that the children would not be returning to Africa. The husband followed a few days later and the couple attended counselling. The husband returned to the NHCAS he says for business reasons and the children were enrolled in and commenced school in Australia. 

    The husband’s solicitor wrote to the wife requesting that the children return to the NHCAS and threatening a court application. No application was made. In September 2018 the husband returned to Australia for 10 days and was involved in the children’s schooling taking them to and from school. In October the wife and children moved out of the wife’s parents home and into their own accommodation. In November the wife filed an application for parenting orders in the Australian court. The husband responded seeking orders that the children be returned to the NHCAS and that matters of their care be resolved in the courts of that state. No applications had been made to the courts of the NHCAS.

    The wife is an Australian citizen and the husband is a citizen of the NHCAS. The children were born in Australia and are dual citizens. The couple and the children have visited Australia annually. The couple run their safari tour business through an Australian bank account. They have significant savings in Australia and own a house in Australia having contemplated a 12-month stay in Australia at some time.

    Essentially the question before the judge was weather their should be a summary hearing on the question of weather the children should be returned to the NHAS or weather there should be an expedited hearing of a broader nature allowing the testing of the evidence about the children being settled in Australia.

    Ruling:  

    The judge ordered a more comprehensive hearing on the merits and decided that it would not be in the best interests of the children for the matter to proceed on a summary basis. That hearing was expedited.

    Legal basis:

    • Delay on the part of the husband in taking action after the letter sent by his solicitor
    • Allowing and participating in the children establishing themselves in Australia (school, sports and separate accommodation). Parra 88 The fact that the children have settled, even on a temporary basis, in Australia and have set down roots is important
    • Balancing when the matter might be heard in the NHCAS and Australia given that no proceedings on foot in the NHCAS and that an expedited hearing in May 2019 would be ordered in Australia
    • Need to determine the views of the children and their level of maturity
    • Need to test the wife’s statement that she will not return to Africa and the implications of her attitude 
    • Need to test the parties conflicting assertions as to who was principally responsible for the care of the children in the NHCAS
    • Para 90 In essence therefore there are a number of issues that need investigation and in respect of controversial issues, the evidence needs to be tested.  In my view therefore it is not appropriate or in the best interests of these children that there simply be a summary hearing in which the children are returned to Africa for the issue to be fully canvassed.

    Rosa Saladino 

  • Proposed legislative change

    The government is looking to legislate to protect the interests of children and donors by providing access to information about pregnancy outcomes from donated gametes.

  • Sending your children overseas for the holidays

    Sending your children overseas for the holidays

    Things go wrong in the best of families. Its what you do next that makes the difference. Children benefit from continuing input from both parents even after separation and sometimes this involves the children travelling overseas to spend time with the parent with whom they do not live day to day. In most cases these holiday trips are just what they should be, an opportunity to spend time and catch up with the non-resident parent. Sometimes however the day-to-day presence of the children during the holiday period raises simmering resentments and the natural desire in the non-resident parent to retain the children beyond the agreed period or sometimes not to send them back at all. This often happens, as children get older. In the glow of holiday time spent with a parent whom distance renders more interesting than the day to day parent, the children themselves may express wishes to stay longer or permanently with the other parent.

    We all know how this kind of situation should be handled. The parents should listen to what the children are saying and then have a serious talk about how or if the children’s wishes should or could be accommodated. In most cases I am sure this is exactly what happens. Family Relationship Centres may be able to assist parents to focus on the real issues and on realistic compromises.

    An old barrister I once knew worked on the principle of the six Ps. That is Prior Preparation Prevents Piss Poor Performance and I think that principle is applicable here.

    There are things, which parents can do which may prevent these situations arising and if they do arise may assist to resolve the problem with the least damage to the children, the relationship and the bank account.

    Things which can be done prior to the children’s departure

    Make clear and unambiguous arrangements for the children’s travel and return. This includes both parents agreeing preferably in writing on the date of departure and the date of return and both having  having copies of the children’s:

    • Airline tickets
    • Passports
    • Itinerary
    • Contact details including an emergency contact if something goes wrong with the primary contact method.

    Take the time to understand and agree with the travel arrangements. Forget the turf war and my time and your time. Insist on detail.  It may on occasions be cheaper to buy a one-way ticket but it’s going to take a lot of explaining about why this was done if the children are not returned. It is often a good arrangement for the receiving parent to arrange travel overseas and the custodial parent to arrange the travel back to Australia. But both parents should know at all times how and when the children are to travel and how they can be contacted.

    He is not trying to control you if he wants to know and she is not interfering with your time if she wants to know.

    Make sure that any orders or parenting plans are up to date and that you have sealed copies of any orders and signed copies of any parenting plan.

    Often parents make adjustments to accommodate the development of the children and their own life circumstances. This is natural and in fact a sign of good responsive parenting but if you are trying to prove that young Garry should have been returned on Christmas Eve and the orders say that he can stay until the beginning of the school term, it becomes a battle of he said she said which a poor judge must resolve probably in a crowded post Christmas list. If there are discrepancies between the arrangements as they currently are and the orders or parenting plan an exchange of emails setting out the current arrangements will remove a whole area of stress dispute and costs.

    Sections 63D and 64E of the Family Law Act, 1975are of assistance here.

    S63D Parenting plan may be varied or revoked by further written agreement

    A parenting plan, other than a plan to which section 63DB applies, may be varied or revoked by agreement in writing between the parties to the plan.

    S64D Parenting orders subject to later parenting plans

    (1)  Subject to subsection (2), a parenting order in relation to a child is taken to include a provision that the order is subject to a parenting plan that is:

    (a) entered into subsequently by the child’s parents; and

    (b) agreed to, in writing, by any other person (other than the child) to whom the parenting order applies.

    If the children are going to a Hague Convention country the sending parent should consider obtaining detailed information about how the Hague Convention is administered in that country and details on that country’s level of compliance with the Hague Convention.

    For information on the Hague Convention visit

    Before you send the children overseas, you might consider consulting a lawyer in the other country to ascertain whether there are specific requirements in that country, regarding children’s international travel. For example, in some countries, the written consent of both parents is required before children are able to leave the country. For these countries, it would be prudent before the children’s departure from Australia, for you to get the consent in writing from the other parent to the children leaving the overseas country and returning to Australia.

    The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) keeps lists of English speaking lawyers in overseas countries. In the case of an emergency you can contact DFAT for 24 hours a day 7 days a week within Australia: 1300 555 135 and outside Australia: +61 2 6261 3305 SMS +61 421 269 080on 02 6261 1111 and on their website https://dfat.gov.au/pages/default.aspx

    What you can do if your children are retained overseas

    Hague Convention Countries

    The 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is an agreement between over 93 countries to facilitate the speedy return of children wrongfully removed to or retained in another Hague Convention country by a parent. Australia, New Zealand, the United States, the United Kingdom and most European countries have all committed to the Hague Convention. A list of countries is available at: https://www.ag.gov.au/FamiliesAndMarriage/Families/InternationalFamilyLaw/Pages/HagueConventionOnTheCivilAspectsOfInternationalChildAbduction.aspx

    If your children are retained in a Hague Convention Country you should immediately make an application for their return. Contact your lawyer or International Social Services Australia for assistance. Contact details are on their website http://www.iss.org.au.

    Non-Hague Convention Countries

    If your children are retained in a non-Hague Convention Country, you can seek to recover your children by commencing parenting proceedings under that country’s domestic law. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade can provide a list of legal and social services, including a list of local English speaking lawyers.

    The Australian Government may provide financial assistance to obtain the return of the children to Australia. The financial assistance may cover the fees of the overseas lawyer, your travel costs to attend the hearing and the costs involved in returning your children to Australia. To obtain more information on eligibility and assistance, please visit the Attorney-General’s Department Financial Assistance website: https://www.ag.gov.au/ LegalSystem/Legalaidprogrammes/Commonwealthlegalfinancialassistance/Pages/ default.aspx

    Australian Federal Police

    If your children have disappeared and you don’t know where they are, you can attend your local police station and file a missing persons’ report. This report will be forwarded to Interpol Canberra requesting assistance to locate your child overseas.

  • Cuba accedes to the Child Abduction Convention

    On 12 September 2018 Cuba acceded the the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Before applications seeking the return of children between Australia and Cuba can be lodged, the Australian Government will have to accept the accession. To find out when the accession of Cuba may be accepted by Australia you should contact the Australian Central Authority.The Contact details are set out below.

    Australian Central Authority
    International Family Law Section
    Robert Garran Offices
    3-5 National Circuit
    BARTON ACT 2600

    4 National Circuit
    BARTON ACT 2600

    Tel. +61(0)2 6141 6666

    https://www.ag.gov.au/FamiliesAndMarriage/Families/InternationalFamilyLaw/Pages/InternationalParentalChildAbduction.aspx